This post is also available in: Dutch
The alleged escapades of Dominique Strauss-Kahn (DSK) have made the search for a new IMF chief a pressing issue. With the risk that someone will be appointed who may not be fully fit for the job.
Being the paymasters, the Europeans prefer a European in the high position. The most frequently mentioned candidate is the current French Finance Minister, Christine Lagarde. She can now count on the support of the European Commission and of most European capitals, including Rome, Berlin, London and The Hague. Her professional skills are unquestionable. However, if Lagarde becomes indeed the successor to Strauss-Kahn, a compatriot, she might be forced to leave the stage early as well, to report to the court.
Earlier last week, the French attorney general early asked the Court of the Republic (CJR), the only authority competent to prosecute incumbent ministers, to start an investigation into possible favoritism by Lagarde. The affair hanging like a sword of Damocles over her head is the one of Bernard Tapie. It’s a complicated, lingering case that seems to be a French specialty. The beloved and flamboyant Tapie, nicknamed ‘Nanard’, has been a minister during Mitterrand’s presidency, president of the football club Olympique Marseille, businessman, actor. He now earns his living as internet entrepreneur. Tapie also owned sports brand Adidas, which he sold in 1993. Two years later, the businessman discovered he was a victim of a financial construction by the bank Crédit Lyonnais (now called LCL) that handled the 1993 sale. He sues the bank, the beginning of a very long court case. In 2005, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Tapie. In July 2008, after arbitrage, Bernard Tapie is awarded 390 million euros, of which a staggering 45 million for ‘moral dammage’, an exceptional amount in French jurisprudence. After deduction of his tax debts, Tapie was left with a net amount of 210 million euros, courtesy of the French taxpayer. According to the media, the interests of Tapie, also a friend of Nicolas Sarkozy, were protected too much, whereas the interests of the French State were neglected. Christine Lagarde, acting on Sarkozy’s instructions, was supervising the arbitrage. However, in 2008 Lagarde already denied being a ‘copine‘, a friend, of Tapie.
A confidential report by the Court of Audit, leaked through the website Mediapart, confirms that Lagarde has indeed been quite generous to Tapie. According to Lagarde herself, the investigation is part of a smear campaign. With the current knowledge, European leaders of government would be wiser to refrain from supporting Lagarde. When I asked the Dutch Finance Minister this afternoon about Lagarde, he said, “If she’s Europe’s candidate, I will support her. No further comment.”
UPDATE 25 MAY 2011
This morning, Christine Lagarde formalised her candidacy and sent her letter of application — in English — to the Board of the IMF, on the eve of the G8 Summit in Deauville. At the press conference, she said she had a “perfectly clear conscience” about the Tapie affair and that she maintains her candidacy, even though there will be an investigation. The Court of the Republic will announce on June 10 whether there will be a formal case. Interesting detail: On the same day, the IMF announces who will be DSK’s successor.
Mediapart revealed two more scandals that could lead to Lagarde’s prosecution, while daily newspaper Libération reports on a possible conflict of interest. To say European support to Lagarde is a risky bet would be a euphemism.
UPDATE 27 AUGUST 2014
Christine Lagarde has been officially charged with ‘negligence’ in the Tapie Case. The IMF-boss refuses to resign and called the charges ‘completely unfounded’.